Skip to main content
SizeVS

Gigabyte M32U vs AOC U2790VQ

Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Gigabyte M32U is 17.9% taller
Gigabyte M32U
719mm×1041mm
AOC U2790VQ
610mm×612mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte

3 wins
B

AOC U2790VQ

AOC

1 wins
📱

Screen Size

Gigabyte M32U

32"

AOC U2790VQ

27"

Difference: 5" (18.5% more)
đŸŽŦ

Resolution

Gigabyte M32U

3840x2160

AOC U2790VQ

3840x2160

đŸ–Ĩī¸

Refresh Rate

Gigabyte M32U

144Hz

AOC U2790VQ

60Hz

Difference: 84Hz (140.0% more)
🎨

Panel

Gigabyte M32U

IPS

AOC U2790VQ

IPS

⚡

Response Time

Gigabyte M32U

1ms

AOC U2790VQ

5ms

Difference: 4ms (400.0% less)
💰

Price

Gigabyte M32U

699$

AOC U2790VQ

299$

Difference: 400$ (133.8% less)
Gigabyte M32U
AOC U2790VQ
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: aoc.com
Advertisement
Ad Space

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons