ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs ViewSonic XG2405-2
True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.
100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.
100%
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM is 4.7% taller
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
336mm×597.7mm
VS
ViewSonic XG2405-2
321mm×539mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
ASUS
3 wins
B
ViewSonic XG2405-2
ViewSonic
1 wins
S
Screen Size
Better
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
27"
ViewSonic XG2405-2
24"
Difference:
3"
(12.5% more)
R
Resolution
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
2560x1440
ViewSonic XG2405-2
1920x1080
R
Refresh Rate
Better
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
240Hz
ViewSonic XG2405-2
180Hz
Difference:
60Hz
(33.3% more)
P
Panel
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
WOLED
ViewSonic XG2405-2
IPS
R
Response Time
Better
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
0.03ms
ViewSonic XG2405-2
1ms
Difference:
0.97ms
(3233.3% less)
P
Price
Better
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
899$
ViewSonic XG2405-2
179$
Difference:
720$
(402.2% less)
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
ViewSonic XG2405-2
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: rog.asus.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: viewsonic.com
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public
Explore this matchup
More related comparisons
Dell Alienware AW3225QFvsASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
Compare specs & size →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDMvsASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
Compare specs & size →
Gigabyte M28UvsASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
Compare specs & size →
Acer Nitro XV275K P3vsASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
Compare specs & size →
MSI MAG 274QRF QD E2vsASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
Compare specs & size →
LG UltraGear 32GS95UEvsASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM
Compare specs & size →