Skip to main content
SizeVS

LG UltraWide 38WN95C vs Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P is 52.2% taller
LG UltraWide 38WN95C
464.5mm×897.5mm
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
707mm×1412mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

LG

2 wins
B

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Gigabyte

2 wins
📱

Screen Size

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

38"

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

32"

Difference: 6" (18.8% more)
đŸŽŦ

Resolution

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

3840x1600

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

3840x2160

đŸ–Ĩī¸

Refresh Rate

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

60Hz

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

240Hz

Difference: 180Hz (300.0% more)
🎨

Panel

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

Nano IPS

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

QD-OLED

⚡

Response Time

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

5ms

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

0.03ms

Difference: 4.97ms (16566.7% less)
💰

Price

LG UltraWide 38WN95C

1,299$

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

1,399$

Difference: 100$ (7.7% less)
LG UltraWide 38WN95C
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: lg.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Advertisement
Ad Space

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons