Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 vs Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.
100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.
100%
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P is 73.3% taller
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
408mm×1195mm
VS
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
707mm×1412mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Samsung
1 wins
B
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Gigabyte
2 wins
S
Screen Size
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
57"
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
32"
Difference:
25"
(78.1% more)
R
Resolution
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
7680x2160
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
3840x2160
R
Refresh Rate
= Tie
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
240Hz
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
240Hz
Difference:
0Hz
P
Panel
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Mini-LED VA
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
QD-OLED
R
Response Time
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
1ms
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
0.03ms
Difference:
0.97ms
(3233.3% less)
P
Price
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
2,499$
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
1,399$
Difference:
1,100$
(78.6% less)
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: samsung.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public
Explore this matchup
More related comparisons
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDMvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDMvsGigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Compare specs & size →
Dell Alienware AW3225QFvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →
Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED 32vsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →
Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED 32vsGigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Compare specs & size →
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEvsGigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Compare specs & size →