Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 vs Gigabyte G27FC
True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.
100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.
100%
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 is 21.4% taller
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
408mm×1195mm
VS
Gigabyte G27FC
336mm×597.7mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Samsung
2 wins
B
Gigabyte G27FC
Gigabyte
1 wins
S
Screen Size
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
57"
Gigabyte G27FC
27"
Difference:
30"
(111.1% more)
R
Resolution
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
7680x2160
Gigabyte G27FC
1920x1080
R
Refresh Rate
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
240Hz
Gigabyte G27FC
165Hz
Difference:
75Hz
(45.5% more)
P
Panel
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Mini-LED VA
Gigabyte G27FC
VA
R
Response Time
= Tie
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
1ms
Gigabyte G27FC
1ms
Difference:
0ms
P
Price
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
2,499$
Gigabyte G27FC
179$
Difference:
2,320$
(1296.1% less)
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Gigabyte G27FC
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: samsung.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public
Explore this matchup
More related comparisons
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDMvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →
Dell Alienware AW3225QFvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →
Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED 32vsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →
Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED 32vsGigabyte G27FC
Compare specs & size →
LG 27GR95QE-BvsGigabyte G27FC
Compare specs & size →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDMvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size →