Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 vs Gigabyte GS27QC
Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications
100% Objective Comparisons â Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 is 10.9% taller
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
408mmÃ1195mm
VS
Gigabyte GS27QC
368mmÃ614mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Samsung
2 wins
B
Gigabyte GS27QC
Gigabyte
1 wins
đą
Screen Size
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
57"
Gigabyte GS27QC
27"
Difference:
30"
(111.1% more)
đŦ
Resolution
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
7680x2160
Gigabyte GS27QC
2560x1440
đĨī¸
Refresh Rate
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
240Hz
Gigabyte GS27QC
165Hz
Difference:
75Hz
(45.5% more)
đ¨
Panel
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Mini-LED VA
Gigabyte GS27QC
VA
âĄ
Response Time
= Tie
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
1ms
Gigabyte GS27QC
1ms
Difference:
0ms
đ°
Price
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
2,499$
Gigabyte GS27QC
279$
Difference:
2,220$
(795.7% less)
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Gigabyte GS27QC
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: samsung.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Advertisement
Ad Space
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public
Explore this matchup
More related comparisons
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2PvsGigabyte GS27QC
Compare specs & size â
Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED 32vsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size â
LG UltraWide 38WN95CvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size â
BenQ SW270CvsGigabyte GS27QC
Compare specs & size â
MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLEDvsGigabyte GS27QC
Compare specs & size â
AOC Q27G3XMNvsGigabyte GS27QC
Compare specs & size â