Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 vs Gigabyte M32UC
Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications
100% Objective Comparisons â Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 is 4.2% taller
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
408mmÃ1195mm
VS
Gigabyte M32UC
425mmÃ710mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Samsung
2 wins
B
Gigabyte M32UC
Gigabyte
1 wins
đą
Screen Size
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
57"
Gigabyte M32UC
32"
Difference:
25"
(78.1% more)
đŦ
Resolution
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
7680x2160
Gigabyte M32UC
3840x2160
đĨī¸
Refresh Rate
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
240Hz
Gigabyte M32UC
144Hz
Difference:
96Hz
(66.7% more)
đ¨
Panel
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Mini-LED VA
Gigabyte M32UC
VA
âĄ
Response Time
= Tie
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
1ms
Gigabyte M32UC
1ms
Difference:
0ms
đ°
Price
Better
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
2,499$
Gigabyte M32UC
649$
Difference:
1,850$
(285.1% less)
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9
Gigabyte M32UC
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: samsung.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Advertisement
Ad Space
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public
Explore this matchup
More related comparisons
Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED 32vsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size â
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2PvsGigabyte M32UC
Compare specs & size â
LG UltraWide 38WN95CvsSamsung Odyssey Neo G9
Compare specs & size â
MSI MAG 323UPFvsGigabyte M32UC
Compare specs & size â
MSI G2712vsGigabyte M32UC
Compare specs & size â
Gigabyte M32UCvsViewSonic VG2455
Compare specs & size â