Samsung S27A600 vs Gigabyte M32UC
Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications
100% Objective Comparisons â Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Gigabyte M32UC is 16.8% taller
Samsung S27A600
364mmÃ612mm
VS
Gigabyte M32UC
425mmÃ710mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Samsung S27A600
Samsung
1 wins
B
Gigabyte M32UC
Gigabyte
3 wins
đą
Screen Size
Better
Samsung S27A600
27"
Gigabyte M32UC
32"
Difference:
5"
(18.5% more)
đŦ
Resolution
Samsung S27A600
2560x1440
Gigabyte M32UC
3840x2160
đĨī¸
Refresh Rate
Better
Samsung S27A600
75Hz
Gigabyte M32UC
144Hz
Difference:
69Hz
(92.0% more)
đ¨
Panel
Samsung S27A600
IPS
Gigabyte M32UC
VA
âĄ
Response Time
Better
Samsung S27A600
5ms
Gigabyte M32UC
1ms
Difference:
4ms
(400.0% less)
đ°
Price
Better
Samsung S27A600
299$
Gigabyte M32UC
649$
Difference:
350$
(117.1% less)
Samsung S27A600
Gigabyte M32UC
Winner in category
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: samsung.com
Last updated: March 22, 2026
Source: gigabyte.com
Advertisement
Ad Space
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public
Explore this matchup
More related comparisons
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2PvsGigabyte M32UC
Compare specs & size â
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEvsSamsung S27A600
Compare specs & size â
MSI MAG 323UPFvsSamsung S27A600
Compare specs & size â
MSI MAG 323UPFvsGigabyte M32UC
Compare specs & size â
LG 27GN800vsSamsung S27A600
Compare specs & size â
MSI G2712vsGigabyte M32UC
Compare specs & size â