Skip to main content
SizeVS

17 Ultra (China) vs Redmi Note 15

True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology

Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.

100%
17 Ultra (China) is 1.6% taller
17 Ultra (China) — 162.5mm × 75.8mm
17 Ultra (China)
162.5mm×75.8mm
Redmi Note 15 — 159.9mm × 73.8mm
Redmi Note 15
159.9mm×73.8mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

17 Ultra (China)

Xiaomi

4 wins
B

Redmi Note 15

Xiaomi

3 wins
S

Screen Size

17 Ultra (China)

6.73"

Redmi Note 15

6.67"

Difference: 0.06" (0.9% more)
B

Battery

=

17 Ultra (China)

5,000mAh

Redmi Note 15

5,000mAh

Difference: 0mAh
R

RAM

17 Ultra (China)

12GB

Redmi Note 15

8GB

Difference: 4GB (50.0% more)
W

Weight

17 Ultra (China)

228g

Redmi Note 15

193g

Difference: 35g (18.1% less)
S

Storage

17 Ultra (China)

256GB

Redmi Note 15

128GB

Difference: 128GB (100.0% more)
M

Main Camera

17 Ultra (China)

200MP

Redmi Note 15

108MP

Difference: 92MP (85.2% more)
P

Price

17 Ultra (China)

899$

Redmi Note 15

199$

Difference: 700$ (351.8% less)
H

Height

17 Ultra (China)

162.5mm

Redmi Note 15

159.9mm

W

Width

17 Ultra (China)

75.8mm

Redmi Note 15

73.8mm

T

Thickness

17 Ultra (China)

9.1mm

Redmi Note 15

8.1mm

Difference: 1mm (12.3% less)
17 Ultra (China)
Redmi Note 15
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons