Skip to main content
SizeVS

17 Ultra (China) vs Reno15 (China)

True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology

Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.

100%
17 Ultra (China) is 1.4% taller
17 Ultra (China) — 162.5mm × 75.8mm
17 Ultra (China)
162.5mm×75.8mm
Reno15 (China) — 160.2mm × 73.4mm
Reno15 (China)
160.2mm×73.4mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

17 Ultra (China)

Xiaomi

4 wins
B

Reno15 (China)

Oppo

3 wins
S

Screen Size

17 Ultra (China)

6.73"

Reno15 (China)

6.7"

Difference: 0.03" (0.4% more)
B

Battery

17 Ultra (China)

5,000mAh

Reno15 (China)

4,500mAh

Difference: 500mAh (11.1% more)
R

RAM

17 Ultra (China)

12GB

Reno15 (China)

8GB

Difference: 4GB (50.0% more)
W

Weight

17 Ultra (China)

228g

Reno15 (China)

171g

Difference: 57g (33.3% less)
S

Storage

=

17 Ultra (China)

256GB

Reno15 (China)

256GB

Difference: 0GB
M

Main Camera

17 Ultra (China)

200MP

Reno15 (China)

64MP

Difference: 136MP (212.5% more)
P

Price

17 Ultra (China)

899$

Reno15 (China)

599$

Difference: 300$ (50.1% less)
H

Height

17 Ultra (China)

162.5mm

Reno15 (China)

160.2mm

W

Width

17 Ultra (China)

75.8mm

Reno15 (China)

73.4mm

T

Thickness

17 Ultra (China)

9.1mm

Reno15 (China)

7.9mm

Difference: 1.2mm (15.2% less)
17 Ultra (China)
Reno15 (China)
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons