Skip to main content
SizeVS

Ace 5 Pro vs Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology

Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.

100%
Ace 5 Pro is 2.0% taller
Ace 5 Pro — 163.1mm × 75.1mm
Ace 5 Pro
163.1mm×75.1mm
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G — 159.9mm × 73.9mm
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
159.9mm×73.9mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Ace 5 Pro

OnePlus

3 wins
B

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

Xiaomi

5 wins
S

Screen Size

Ace 5 Pro

6.7"

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

6.67"

Difference: 0.03" (0.4% more)
B

Battery

Ace 5 Pro

5,000mAh

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

5,020mAh

Difference: 20mAh (0.4% more)
R

RAM

Ace 5 Pro

12GB

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

8GB

Difference: 4GB (50.0% more)
W

Weight

Ace 5 Pro

205g

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

185g

Difference: 20g (10.8% less)
S

Storage

Ace 5 Pro

256GB

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

128GB

Difference: 128GB (100.0% more)
M

Main Camera

Ace 5 Pro

50MP

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

108MP

Difference: 58MP (116.0% more)
P

Price

Ace 5 Pro

699$

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

299$

Difference: 400$ (133.8% less)
H

Height

Ace 5 Pro

163.1mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

159.9mm

W

Width

Ace 5 Pro

75.1mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

73.9mm

T

Thickness

Ace 5 Pro

8.7mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

8.1mm

Difference: 0.6mm (7.4% less)
Ace 5 Pro
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons