Skip to main content
SizeVS

Galaxy Z TriFold vs Galaxy M16

Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Galaxy Z TriFold is 3.3% taller
Galaxy Z TriFold
159.2mm×214.1mm
Galaxy M16
164.4mm×77.9mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Galaxy Z TriFold

Samsung

4 wins
B

Galaxy M16

Samsung

2 wins
📱

Screen Size

Galaxy Z TriFold

N/A

Galaxy M16

6.7"

🔋

Battery

Galaxy Z TriFold

5,600mAh

Galaxy M16

5,000mAh

Difference: 600mAh (12.0% more)
💾

RAM

Galaxy Z TriFold

16GB

Galaxy M16

4GB

Difference: 12GB (300.0% more)
âš–ī¸

Weight

Galaxy Z TriFold

309g

Galaxy M16

191g

Difference: 118g (61.8% less)
đŸ’ŋ

Storage

Galaxy Z TriFold

512GB

Galaxy M16

128GB

Difference: 384GB (300.0% more)
📷

Main Camera

Galaxy Z TriFold

N/A

Galaxy M16

50MP

💰

Price

Galaxy Z TriFold

2,899$

Galaxy M16

249$

Difference: 2,650$ (1064.3% less)
📏

Height

Galaxy Z TriFold

159.2mm

Galaxy M16

164.4mm

📐

Width

Galaxy Z TriFold

214.1mm

Galaxy M16

77.9mm

đŸ“Ļ

Thickness

Galaxy Z TriFold

3.9mm

Galaxy M16

7.9mm

Difference: 4mm (102.6% less)
Galaxy Z TriFold
Galaxy M16
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Advertisement
Ad Space

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons