Galaxy Z TriFold vs Galaxy M16
True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.
100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.
100%
Galaxy M16 is 3.3% taller
Galaxy Z TriFold
159.2mm×214.1mm
VS
Galaxy M16
164.4mm×77.9mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Galaxy Z TriFold
Samsung
4 wins
B
Galaxy M16
Samsung
2 wins
S
Screen Size
Galaxy Z TriFold
N/A
Galaxy M16
6.7"
B
Battery
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
5,600mAh
Galaxy M16
5,000mAh
Difference:
600mAh
(12.0% more)
R
RAM
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
16GB
Galaxy M16
4GB
Difference:
12GB
(300.0% more)
W
Weight
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
309g
Galaxy M16
191g
Difference:
118g
(61.8% less)
S
Storage
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
512GB
Galaxy M16
128GB
Difference:
384GB
(300.0% more)
M
Main Camera
Galaxy Z TriFold
N/A
Galaxy M16
50MP
P
Price
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
2,899$
Galaxy M16
249$
Difference:
2,650$
(1064.3% less)
H
Height
Galaxy Z TriFold
159.2mm
Galaxy M16
164.4mm
W
Width
Galaxy Z TriFold
214.1mm
Galaxy M16
77.9mm
T
Thickness
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
3.9mm
Galaxy M16
7.9mm
Difference:
4mm
(102.6% less)
Galaxy Z TriFold
Galaxy M16
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public