Skip to main content
SizeVS

Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Galaxy XCover7 Pro is 5.4% taller
Galaxy XCover7 Pro
168.6mm×79.9mm
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
159.9mm×73.9mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

Samsung

0 wins
B

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

Xiaomi

7 wins
📱

Screen Size

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

6.6"

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

6.67"

Difference: 0.07" (1.1% more)
🔋

Battery

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

4,350mAh

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

5,020mAh

Difference: 670mAh (15.4% more)
💾

RAM

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

6GB

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

8GB

Difference: 2GB (33.3% more)
âš–ī¸

Weight

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

240g

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

185g

Difference: 55g (29.7% less)
đŸ’ŋ

Storage

=

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

128GB

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

128GB

Difference: 0GB
📷

Main Camera

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

50MP

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

108MP

Difference: 58MP (116.0% more)
💰

Price

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

384$

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

299$

Difference: 85$ (28.4% less)
📏

Height

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

168.6mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

159.9mm

📐

Width

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

79.9mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

73.9mm

đŸ“Ļ

Thickness

Galaxy XCover7 Pro

10.2mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

8.1mm

Difference: 2.1mm (25.9% less)
Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Advertisement
Ad Space

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons