Galaxy Z TriFold vs X300
Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications
100% Objective Comparisons â Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Galaxy Z TriFold is 3.0% taller
Galaxy Z TriFold
159.2mmÃ214.1mm
VS
X300
164mmÃ75mm
Scaled to real proportions
Specifications Comparison
A
Galaxy Z TriFold
Samsung
4 wins
B
X300
vivo
2 wins
đą
Screen Size
Galaxy Z TriFold
N/A
X300
6.7"
đ
Battery
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
5,600mAh
X300
5,000mAh
Difference:
600mAh
(12.0% more)
đž
RAM
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
16GB
X300
8GB
Difference:
8GB
(100.0% more)
âī¸
Weight
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
309g
X300
192g
Difference:
117g
(60.9% less)
đŋ
Storage
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
512GB
X300
128GB
Difference:
384GB
(300.0% more)
đˇ
Main Camera
Galaxy Z TriFold
N/A
X300
64MP
đ°
Price
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
2,899$
X300
299$
Difference:
2,600$
(869.6% less)
đ
Height
Galaxy Z TriFold
159.2mm
X300
164mm
đ
Width
Galaxy Z TriFold
214.1mm
X300
75mm
đĻ
Thickness
Better
Galaxy Z TriFold
3.9mm
X300
8.5mm
Difference:
4.6mm
(117.9% less)
Galaxy Z TriFold
X300
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Advertisement
Ad Space
Why Trust Our Comparisons
Verified Data
All specs verified from official sources
No Affiliate Bias
We don't earn from product sales
Regularly Updated
Data refreshed when specs change
Transparent Method
Our comparison methodology is public