Skip to main content
SizeVS

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus vs iQOO Z10 Turbo+

Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is 3.9% taller
Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus
158mm×76mm
iQOO Z10 Turbo+
164.2mm×76.5mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

Samsung

6 wins
B

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

vivo

1 wins
📱

Screen Size

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

6.7"

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

6.67"

Difference: 0.03" (0.4% more)
🔋

Battery

=

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

5,000mAh

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

5,000mAh

Difference: 0mAh
💾

RAM

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

12GB

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

8GB

Difference: 4GB (50.0% more)
âš–ī¸

Weight

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

195g

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

198g

Difference: 3g (1.5% less)
đŸ’ŋ

Storage

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

256GB

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

128GB

Difference: 128GB (100.0% more)
📷

Main Camera

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

108MP

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

64MP

Difference: 44MP (68.8% more)
💰

Price

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

999$

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

299$

Difference: 700$ (234.1% less)
📏

Height

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

158mm

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

164.2mm

📐

Width

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

76mm

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

76.5mm

đŸ“Ļ

Thickness

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

7.7mm

iQOO Z10 Turbo+

8.5mm

Difference: 0.8mm (10.4% less)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus
iQOO Z10 Turbo+
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Advertisement
Ad Space

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons