Skip to main content
SizeVS

Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Razr 60 Ultra

True-scale visual comparison — see exact mm dimensions side by side with detailed specs.

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology

Choose how to display the two devices: stacked, overlapped, or split with a slider.

100%
Razr 60 Ultra is 16.7% taller
Samsung Galaxy S25 — 146.9mm × 70.5mm
Samsung Galaxy S25
146.9mm×70.5mm
Razr 60 Ultra — 171.5mm × 74mm
Razr 60 Ultra
171.5mm×74mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Samsung Galaxy S25

Samsung

3 wins
B

Razr 60 Ultra

Motorola

3 wins
S

Screen Size

Samsung Galaxy S25

6.2"

Razr 60 Ultra

6.9"

Difference: 0.7" (11.3% more)
B

Battery

Samsung Galaxy S25

4,000mAh

Razr 60 Ultra

4,700mAh

Difference: 700mAh (17.5% more)
R

RAM

Samsung Galaxy S25

12GB

Razr 60 Ultra

16GB

Difference: 4GB (33.3% more)
W

Weight

Samsung Galaxy S25

162g

Razr 60 Ultra

199g

Difference: 37g (22.8% less)
S

Storage

=

Samsung Galaxy S25

256GB

Razr 60 Ultra

256GB

Difference: 0GB
M

Main Camera

Samsung Galaxy S25

50MP

Razr 60 Ultra

12MP

Difference: 38MP (316.7% more)
P

Price

Samsung Galaxy S25

799$

Razr 60 Ultra

999$

Difference: 200$ (25.0% less)
H

Height

Samsung Galaxy S25

146.9mm

Razr 60 Ultra

171.5mm

W

Width

Samsung Galaxy S25

70.5mm

Razr 60 Ultra

74mm

T

Thickness

=

Samsung Galaxy S25

7.2mm

Razr 60 Ultra

7.2mm

Difference: 0mm
Samsung Galaxy S25
Razr 60 Ultra
Winner in category
Last updated: March 24, 2026
Source: samsung.com
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons